Make.com vs Zapier Security
Which platform is safer for AI workflows — and what actually matters for your security.
Published April 21, 2026 · 6 min read · By Scannly
Neither Make.com nor Zapier is inherently more secure for AI workflows. Both have the same core vulnerability: AI steps that process unvalidated external inputs are susceptible to prompt injection. Neither platform provides built-in AI input validation or prompt injection protection. The platform you choose matters far less than how you configure and secure your workflows on it.
The Security Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make.com | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| AI input validation | Manual — add filter/router before AI module | Manual — add Filter step before AI action |
| Credential storage | Connection Manager — keeps keys out of logs | Connected Accounts — keeps keys out of logs |
| Webhook authentication | Manual — custom header validation required | Manual — filter step required after trigger |
| Execution logging | Scenario history with input/output data | Zap history with step-level data |
| Permission scoping | OAuth scope selection on connection setup | OAuth scope selection on connection setup |
| Error alerting | Built-in email alerts on scenario errors | Built-in email alerts on Zap errors |
| Prompt injection protection | None built-in — manual implementation required | None built-in — manual implementation required |
The Vulnerability Both Platforms Share
The most important security fact about both platforms: neither Make.com nor Zapier provides any built-in protection against prompt injection in AI steps. If your scenario or Zap passes unvalidated user-controlled data into an AI module, it is vulnerable — regardless of which platform you use.
A Zapier workflow that passes a contact form submission directly into a ChatGPT step has the same prompt injection exposure as a Make.com scenario doing the same thing. The platform is irrelevant. The missing validation step is the vulnerability.
Where Make.com Has a Structural Advantage
Make.com's visual scenario builder makes it easier to add parallel validation branches before AI modules. You can route a payload through a validation check and only pass it to the AI module if it passes — all in a visually clear branching structure. In Zapier, the same logic requires sequential filter steps which are less intuitive to audit.
The Security Controls That Matter on Both Platforms
- Add input validation before every AI step — filter or route based on content before the AI sees it
- Store all API keys in the platform's Connection or Credential manager — never in module fields
- Scope OAuth permissions to the minimum required when setting up connections
- Enable execution logging and set up error alerts on failed runs
- Review and audit all connections monthly — revoke anything not actively used
Scan Your Workflows Free
Scannly checks Make.com and Zapier workflows for AI security vulnerabilities in 60 seconds. No account required.
Run My Free Scan →